Author |
Topic: Game 201605 - cvic vs bot_GnoBot2005P1 (Read 875 times) |
|
clyring
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #6218
Gender: 
Posts: 362
|
 |
Re: Game 201605 - cvic vs bot_GnoBot2005P1
« Reply #1 on: Nov 9th, 2011, 5:21pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
It was indeed most likely trying to reduce your elephant's mobility and its lack of extensions and quiescence mean it doesn't realize it is simply sending pieces to their deaths en masse.
|
|
 IP Logged |
I administer the Endless Endgame Event (EEE). Players welcome!
|
|
|
Dolus
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #6845
Gender: 
Posts: 86
|
|
Re: Game 201605 - cvic vs bot_GnoBot2005P1
« Reply #2 on: Nov 9th, 2011, 6:46pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Haha! Looks like he was always missing that last piece to form the phalanx. 
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Fritzlein
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #706
Gender:
Posts: 5928
|
|
Re: Game 201605 - cvic vs bot_GnoBot2005P1
« Reply #3 on: Nov 11th, 2011, 7:42pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Note that P1 doesn't always mean the same thing. Gnobot2005 has no static goal detection, no static capture detection, and no search extension. Thus it is P1 in a much stricter sense than Bomb2005P1 is P1. Gnobot2005P1 literally can't see that you are able to capture its pieces next turn; it relies wholly on static evaluation at the end of its moves.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Login
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print