Author |
Topic: When Grandmasters Blunder (Read 14325 times) |
|
Fritzlein
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #706
Gender:
Posts: 5928
|
|
Re: When Grandmasters Blunder
« Reply #1 on: Mar 1st, 2015, 8:38am » |
Quote Modify
|
Fascinating. I'm astonished that patzers like myself blunder so seldom. I would have expected my own blunder rate to be much higher, based on my rating. I wonder what percentage of wins are attributable to gradually outplaying the opponent as opposed to blundering less often and/or less badly.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
clyring
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #6218
Gender:
Posts: 362
|
|
Re: When Grandmasters Blunder
« Reply #2 on: Mar 1st, 2015, 6:21pm » |
Quote Modify
|
1% doesn't seem so small when considering the length of a chess game. Given 40 moves for each player, that means around half of all grandmaster games contain a multiple-pawn blunder. That's significantly more common than I would previously have guessed.
|
|
IP Logged |
I administer the Endless Endgame Event (EEE). Players welcome!
|
|
|
Fritzlein
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #706
Gender:
Posts: 5928
|
|
Re: When Grandmasters Blunder
« Reply #3 on: Mar 2nd, 2015, 2:31pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I agree, clyring. I'm surprised on both ends of the curve, i.e. surprised grandmasters blunder so often as much as I am surprised that patzers like me blunder so seldom. Thus my wondering how much of a typical Elo advantage is attributable to subtly outplaying the opponent as opposed to having a lower blunder rate.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
half_integer
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #8819
Gender:
Posts: 104
|
|
Re: When Grandmasters Blunder
« Reply #4 on: Apr 12th, 2015, 9:46pm » |
Quote Modify
|
And no one commented on what they named their analysis cluster? (It's in the URL above)
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|