Author |
Topic: Javascript vs. Flash Client (Read 2896 times) |
|
mistre
Forum Guru
Gender: 
Posts: 553
|
 |
Javascript vs. Flash Client
« on: May 31st, 2011, 9:13pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
I recently gave the latest Javascript client another go since Omar voiced in another thread (I can't find it now) that he would like to stop supporting the Flash client at some point.
There are some things that I prefer with the JS client, but other things that I still like better with Flash Client V1 (V2 is not very good due to the fuzziness of the pieces).
What I like better about Flash V1:
1) The overall layout of the buttons is better layed out and visually appealing. Most importantly, the send button is much larger making it easier to click in a blitz game. The player and time info in the JS client is smushed together and quite ugly.
2) I don't like the orange ? in the upper left hand corner in the JS Client that pops up a text box that it is your turn to move after every move. Is this really needed?
3) Must the F3, C3, F6, and C6 in the traps be seen when playing the game? This is fine for planning mode, but it is visually distracting otherwise. At least they could be made smaller.
4) As mentioned before - the blue square problem is an annoyance, but if nothing can be done about it - I can live with it.
5) This is a personal preference, but I don't really see what making the back rows gold and silver really adds to the game and for me it visually detracts from the sharpness and contrast of the board and the pieces.
6) The sounds I will call even (I like both sets - it would be cool to have an option to switch between the two).
I am not sure who created the Javascript client, but any improvements to it would be greatly appreciated if the Flash Client is going to cease to exist.
Thanks,
Mark
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
megajester
Forum Guru
Istanbul, Turkey
Gender:
Posts: 710
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #1 on: Jun 1st, 2011, 12:34am » |
Quote Modify
|
Just by the way, I would like to strongly recommend that whichever client is preferred and developed, the older ones are allowed to remain on the site for the benefit of those using computers that either can't handle JS or where users don't have the admin permission needed to install Flash.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Eltripas
Forum Guru
Meh-he-kah-naw
Gender:
Posts: 225
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #2 on: Jun 1st, 2011, 9:18am » |
Quote Modify
|
V1 is horrible, slow and the time counter is weird, V2 is the best for me but it doesn't have a game plan, JS is decent but the blue square problem is annoying.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Swynndla
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #1821
Posts: 235
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #3 on: Jul 8th, 2011, 5:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I have a gaming mouse, and it's really sensitive, and I get the blue squares often and it's such that I can't move unless I do several clicks to get rid of all the blue-ness (the clicks have to be at the side of the board and several clicks, and those clicks the mouse isn't allowed to move at all or the problem gets worse). I've lost on time a few times when I've had easily enough time (usually) to make a move the the blue squares of death meant I couldn't move. Other than that, I like the JS version a lot.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Nazgand
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #6461
Gender:
Posts: 87
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #4 on: Jul 9th, 2011, 11:17am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 8th, 2011, 5:05pm, Swynndla wrote:| ... and I get the blue squares often and it's such that I can't move unless I do several clicks to get rid of all the blue-ness... |
|
Fixed! Simply add this attribute to the boardspan element.
Code:style="-webkit-user-select: none;
-khtml-user-select: none;
-moz-user-select: none;
-o-user-select: none;
user-select: none;" |
|
You can do this yourself in most browsers, but I will message omar.
Edit: I must admit I rather like having unselectable squares.
|
| « Last Edit: Jul 9th, 2011, 11:25am by Nazgand » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
omar
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #2
Gender:
Posts: 1003
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #5 on: Jul 9th, 2011, 5:17pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Wow, thanks for posting the solution to this. I've been looking for something like this for a while. You must be a CSS guru.
I've modified the client and it seems to work. Awesome !!!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Nazgand
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #6461
Gender:
Posts: 87
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #6 on: Jul 9th, 2011, 11:00pm » |
Quote Modify
|
The BSoD has been demolished! Viva la revolution! (Blue Squares of Death, though Orange SoD in Ubuntu)
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Hippo
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #4450
Gender:
Posts: 883
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #7 on: Jul 10th, 2011, 2:57am » |
Quote Modify
|
WOW, after pressing F5 blue squares disappeared  ... in chrome, but not in mozilla  ... but in mozilla the squares are transparent enough...
|
| « Last Edit: Jul 10th, 2011, 3:01am by Hippo » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
rbarreira
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #1621
Gender:
Posts: 605
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #8 on: Jul 10th, 2011, 4:20am » |
Quote Modify
|
I confirm what Hippo said, in Firefox 3.6.18 (Linux) I still see the selected squares.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
dree12
Forum Senior Member
Arimaa player #4082
Gender:
Posts: 27
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #9 on: Jul 10th, 2011, 1:39pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Firefox 3.6 is an outdated browser... I don't think it even supports moz-user-select (that was added in 4.0?). That's like using IE6 and complaining the entire thing glitches...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
rbarreira
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #1621
Gender:
Posts: 605
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #10 on: Jul 10th, 2011, 2:13pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 10th, 2011, 1:39pm, dree12 wrote:| Firefox 3.6 is an outdated browser... I don't think it even supports moz-user-select (that was added in 4.0?). That's like using IE6 and complaining the entire thing glitches... |
|
Yeah except IE6 is about 8 years older than the first release of Firefox 3.6  Apparently Ubuntu 10.04 doesn't upgrade beyond 3.6 by default...
|
| « Last Edit: Jul 10th, 2011, 2:14pm by rbarreira » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
dree12
Forum Senior Member
Arimaa player #4082
Gender:
Posts: 27
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #11 on: Jul 10th, 2011, 3:07pm » |
Quote Modify
|
4 major versions of IE have been worked on since IE6 (7, 8, 9, 10). In contrast, 5 have been since FF3.6: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. (These are: FF 5.0 RTM, FF 6.0 Beta 1, FF 7.0 Aurora, FF 8.0 Nightly). Sure the FF version numbers are screwed up, but when you think about it there isn't that much difference.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
rbarreira
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #1621
Gender:
Posts: 605
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #12 on: Jul 10th, 2011, 3:31pm » |
Quote Modify
|
This is a pretty silly argument, but let me just say that Firefox 4 shows the same behavior (under Windows in this case). But it came out 4 months ago so I guess it's a dinosaur already
|
| « Last Edit: Jul 10th, 2011, 3:33pm by rbarreira » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
dree12
Forum Senior Member
Arimaa player #4082
Gender:
Posts: 27
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #13 on: Jul 10th, 2011, 4:04pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Yeah, not working here either. Probably a firefox bug since document.getElementById("boardspan").style.MozUserSelect is "none".
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Nazgand
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #6461
Gender:
Posts: 87
|
|
Re: Javascript vs. Flash Client
« Reply #14 on: Jul 10th, 2011, 7:59pm » |
Quote Modify
|
It does not work in Firefox 5.0 either. Aparrently, it is not an inherited property in Firefox. Try changing the mozilla part:
Code:function makeUnselectable(node) {
if (node.style) {
node.style.MozUserSelect = "none";
}
var child = node.firstChild;
while (child) {
makeUnselectable(child);
child = child.nextSibling;
}
}
makeUnselectable(document.getElementById("boardspan")) |
|
I tested it, and it works.
Edit: any other browsers having problems?
|
| « Last Edit: Jul 10th, 2011, 8:06pm by Nazgand » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Login
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print