Author |
Topic: Game lengths (Read 3891 times) |
|
Fritzlein
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #706
Gender: 
Posts: 5928
|
 |
Game lengths
« on: Jan 8th, 2010, 10:21am » |
 Quote  Modify
|
Janzert asked yesterday in chat whether game lengths have been increasing recently. I queried over the games of the last seven years, and found no trend over time.
year all gimpe rated humans 1700+ 1900+
---- --- ----- ----- ------ ----- -----
2003 23.4 26.4 30.0 31.1 38.1 48.1
2004 30.0 32.9 36.4 40.7 44.6 46.8
2005 28.7 33.5 35.9 39.1 45.4 47.5
2006 31.1 34.5 34.6 39.7 43.5 45.3
2007 31.4 35.7 35.3 38.7 45.8 46.2
2008 28.8 34.0 34.5 38.2 44.2 46.9
2009 30.5 35.4 35.4 36.7 44.5 45.7
Each column averages a subset of games from the previous column. First I considered all games, then only games with termination g, i, m, p, or e, then only rated games, then only games with both players human, then only games with both players rated over 1700, then only games with both players rated over 1900.
If we take the last column as most indicative of how long a game of Arimaa "should" last, we see no increase or decrease over time. In the early days of Arimaa, there was a pronounced trend to longer and longer games, but in hindsight this can be explained away simply by noting that we weren't very good at Arimaa at first, and the games got longer when they stopped being such blunderfests.
|
| « Last Edit: Jan 8th, 2010, 10:23am by Fritzlein » |
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
tize
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #3121
Gender:
Posts: 118
|
|
Re: Game lengths
« Reply #1 on: Jan 8th, 2010, 12:15pm » |
Quote Modify
|
If we look at the humans column and ignore the value for 2003, we see a weak trend towards shorter games with 2009 as the lowest. This trend doesn't show up in any other column. I think this shows that the new players are slowly outnumbering the old and strong players, with 2009 being a good year when it comes to attracting new players. Hence the big drop of 1.5.
Or maybe it's all in the margin or error, And I'm just seeing what I want to see. 
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Fritzlein
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #706
Gender:
Posts: 5928
|
|
Re: Game lengths
« Reply #2 on: Jan 8th, 2010, 2:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
One thing I didn't control for was the difference in rating between the two players. Mismatches naturally result in somewhat shorter games. If there is a downward trend in the game lengths for natural-conclusion, rated, HvH, 1900+ games, then the reason could be that in the early years those games were all evenly matched, whereas in more recent years some of them have been mismatched.
|
| « Last Edit: Jan 8th, 2010, 2:06pm by Fritzlein » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Janzert
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #247
Gender:
Posts: 1016
|
|
Re: Game lengths
« Reply #3 on: Jan 8th, 2010, 6:07pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Thanks for running this Fritzlein. I think it's actually surprising how stable the length is given the large changes in strategy over that time.
Janzert
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Hippo
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #4450
Gender:
Posts: 883
|
|
Re: Game lengths
« Reply #4 on: Jan 12th, 2010, 5:20am » |
Quote Modify
|
That would be interesting to compare also the lengths of games in WC's (qualification/final).
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Login
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print