Author |
Topic: Capturing Moves (Read 12359 times) |
|
JimmSlimm
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #6348
Gender:
Posts: 86
|
|
Re: Capturing Moves
« Reply #45 on: Jun 28th, 2013, 11:45am » |
Quote Modify
|
Update: I gave up on the 4step decision tree after working on it for over a week, it just took to much energy away from me Hopefully it will serve as a warning for others thinking about doing the same thing manually, it takes ALOT of time, probably more than most think. There are just SO many cases I made 2step+3step decision trees instead, doable in less than a day. So now, I generate all possible first steps, including push and pulls. And then check the decision tree after that, it has a huge impact on performance, I can only imagine what a full decision tree would do
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
JimmSlimm
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #6348
Gender:
Posts: 86
|
|
Re: Capturing Moves
« Reply #46 on: Oct 8th, 2013, 6:07am » |
Quote Modify
|
I have a 4-step capture decision tree now, it can certainly be improved in speed, and probably has some bugs, but it's good enough. To take it one step further, since fast decision trees/static capture evaluation is so important, has anyone made a 2-ply capture tree? That is, for example: "Can I capture a piece while at the same time NOT allowing opponent to capture any of my pieces?" or even better if you include what piece(s) to get captured: "What is the best material score I can get within 2 plies from this board state?"
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|