Author |
Topic: Trap evaluation in Bomb (Read 2671 times) |
|
fotland
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #211
Gender: 
Posts: 216
|
 |
Trap evaluation in Bomb
« on: Feb 11th, 2007, 7:10pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
First, I never evaluate a position in the middle of a push. Since the next step is forced, I always extend the search one ply instead of evaluating when a piece has just been pushed.
Notation: x-empty, e-enemy, the side doing the capture, f-friend, the piece being captured, p a spot where a piece can be pulled, w-weak enemy piece that has to get out of the way. A capital letter indicates the trap location. The patterns are presented in a line but can be matched bent.
In all cases the enemy piece doing the capture might need to be unfrozen first. This can add 0, 1, or 2 steps (uf).
In many cases an enemy piece can be on the trap and must move off first (on). This can add 0, 1, or 2 steps. 1 step if an enemy can move away. 2 steps to push away a friend. It could be more, but I stop analyzing at 2 steps.
Traps with zero friendly pieces adjacent:
Xef 4 + uf + on, and check that e can move sideways or move onto trap without suicide.
Xwfe - close e must move out of the way. 5 + uf + on, and check that close e not frozen.
Xxfe - 4 + uf + on, and check that e doesn't get frozen when it moves to f spot
Xxfxe - 5 + uf + on, and check two spots that e dosn't get frozen on the way
Epf - 3 + uf
Xpf - 3 + uf + on
Xxef, Xxxfe - 6 + uf + on
Traps with one friendly piece adjacent
ePf - 1 step
Xfe - 2 + uf + on
Ef - 2 + uf, and check if there is empty square to move to
Ffe - 2 + uf
Xfxe - 3 + uf + on, and check if e won't freeze after move
Ffxe - 3 + uf, and check if e won't freeze
Ffpe - 1
Xfwe - 4 + on + uf, and check if e won't freeze
Xfwxe - 5 + on + uf
Xffe - 4 + on + uf, check if e will freeze
Fffe - 4 + uf
Xfxxe - 4 + uf, and check that right x is not unsafe trap
exXf - 4 + uf, and check that trap is safe
eXf - 3 + uf + on, and check that e doesn't suicide
Traps with two friendly pieces adjacent
efXfe - 4 + on. choose to trap the bigger piece
I think this is all of them.
|
| « Last Edit: Feb 12th, 2007, 10:13pm by fotland » |
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
chessandgo
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #1889
Gender:
Posts: 1244
|
|
Re: Trap evaluation in Bomb
« Reply #1 on: Feb 12th, 2007, 5:57am » |
Quote Modify
|
I've been trying to generate capture moves lately, I'm not done yet but I certainly would be very interested to see an extensive list of capture patterns.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
IdahoEv
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #1753
Gender:
Posts: 405
|
|
Re: Trap evaluation in Bomb
« Reply #2 on: Feb 12th, 2007, 1:53pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I would be interested to see them as well.
Thank you for this interesting and informative series of posts. Out of curiosity, what brought them on?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
fotland
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #211
Gender:
Posts: 216
|
|
Re: Trap evaluation in Bomb
« Reply #3 on: Feb 12th, 2007, 8:54pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Feb 12th, 2007, 1:53pm, IdahoEv wrote:I would be interested to see them as well.
Thank you for this interesting and informative series of posts. Out of curiosity, what brought them on? |
|
Fritzlein's post: One wonders how many other efficiency-boosting tricks you casually integrated into your code, based on ideas the rest of us wouldn't hit upon in years.
But then I decided I have to explain the basics before I can explain the mate search, etc.
|
| « Last Edit: Feb 12th, 2007, 8:54pm by fotland » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
chessandgo
Forum Guru
Arimaa player #1889
Gender:
Posts: 1244
|
|
Re: Trap evaluation in Bomb
« Reply #4 on: Feb 20th, 2007, 9:35am » |
Quote Modify
|
Thanks for taking the time typing all these patterns.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Login
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print